Skip to content
Friday, October 16, 2026
Wager Systems

Might Other States Emulate Australia's Lead in Banning Social Platforms for Teenagers Under 16?

The Australian decisive move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

  • Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be passed soon.
  • Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an measures under consideration".
  • In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to approve a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
  • In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
  • The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and suitable for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is largely occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

  • The state of Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
  • Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • Virginia has enacted a law limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on a guardian's okay.
  • The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various figures to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from these regions, further states are also exploring options.

  • The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies take a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that governments around the world are less and less content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.

RN
The writer

Robert Nelson

Marcus Thorne is a seasoned technology journalist specializing in the UK betting industry, with over a decade of experience covering software and regulatory developments.

Wager Systems

Type to search articles.